(Solution) Alvis Corporation Kevin McCarthy is a manager of a production department in Alvis Corporation, a firm that manufactures office equipment. After... > Snapessays.com


(Solution) Alvis Corporation Kevin McCarthy is a manager of a production department in Alvis Corporation, a firm that manufactures office equipment. After...


Hi Schoudhary,

 

 

I need help with this Study cases. I have 2 But I will submit separately so won't get confused.... This is only question, but only needs around 450 words.Alvis Corporation

 

Kevin McCarthy is a manager of a production department in Alvis Corporation, a firm that

 

manufactures office equipment. After reading an article that stressed the benefits of participative

 

management, Kevin believes that these benefits could be realized in his department if the

 

workers are allowed to participate in making some decisions that affect them. The workers are

 

not unionized. Kevin selected two decisions for his experiment in participative management.

 

The first decision involved vacation schedules. Each summer the workers were given two weeks-

 

vacation, but no more than two workers can go on vacation at the same time. In prior years,

 

Kevin made this decision himself. He would first ask the workers to indicate their preference

 

dates, and then he considered how the work would be affected if different people were out at the

 

same time. It was important to plan a vacation schedule that would ensure adequate staffing for

 

all the essential operations performed by the department. When more than two workers wanted

 

the same time period, and they had similar skills, he usually gave preference to the worker with

 

highest productivity.

 

The second decision involved production standards. Sales had been increasing steadily over the

 

past few years, and the company recently installed some new equipment to increase productivity.

 

The new equipment would allow Kevin’s department to produce more with the same number of

 

workers. The company had a pay incentive system in which workers received a piece rate for

 

each unit produced above the standard amount. Separate standards existed for each type of

 

product, based on industrial engineering study conducted a few years earlier. Top management

 

wanted to readjust the production standards to reflect the fact that the new equipment made it

 

possible for the workers to earn without working any harder. The savings from higher

 

productivity were needed to help pay for the new equipment.

 

Kevin called a meeting of his 15 workers an hour before the end of the workday. He explained

 

that he wanted them to discuss the two issues and make recommendations. Kevin figured that the

 

workers might be inhibited about participating in the discussion if he were present, so he left

 

them alone to discuss the issues. Besides, Kevin had an appointment to meet with quality control

 

manager. Quality problems had increased after the new equipment was installed, and the

 

industrial engineers were studying the problem in an attempt to determine why quality had gotten

 

worse rather than better.

 

When Kevin returned to his department just at quitting time, he was surprised to learn that the

 

workers recommended keeping the standards same. He had assumed they know the pay

 

incentives were no longer fair and would set a higher standard. The spokesman for the group

 

explained that their base pay had not kept up with inflation and the higher incentive pay restored

 

their real income to its prior level.

 

On the vacation issue, the group was deadlocked. Several of the workers wanted to take their

 

vacations during the same two-week period and could not agree on who should go. Some

 

workers argued that they should have priority because they had more seniority while others

 

argued that priority should be based on productivity, as in the past. Since it was quitting time, the

 

group concluded that Kevin would have to resolve the dispute himself. After all, wasn’t that what

 

he was being paid for?

 


Solution details:
STATUS
Answered
QUALITY
Approved
ANSWER RATING

This question was answered on: Sep 21, 2023

Solution~00021147636158.zip (25.37 KB)


This attachment is locked

Our expert Writers have done this assignment before, you can reorder for a fresh, original and plagiarism-free copy and it will be redone much faster (Deadline assured. Flexible pricing. TurnItIn Report provided)

Pay using PayPal (No PayPal account Required) or your credit card . All your purchases are securely protected by .
SiteLock

About this Question

STATUS

Answered

QUALITY

Approved

DATE ANSWERED

Sep 21, 2023

EXPERT

Tutor

ANSWER RATING

GET INSTANT HELP

We have top-notch tutors who can do your essay/homework for you at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments.

You can also use these solutions:

  • ■ As a reference for in-depth understanding of the subject.
  • ■ As a source of ideas / reasoning for your own research (if properly referenced)
  • ■ For editing and paraphrasing.

This we believe is a better way of understanding a problem and makes use of the efficiency of time of the student.

Get Free Price Quote