Among the explanations below, which one is not a reason to favor a probability model over a regression-like (e.g., data-mining) model for long-run projections of customer behavior? 1. In a regression-like model, it is necessary (and potentially difficult) to project future values for the independent variables 2. It’s often hard to come up with a full set of independent variables to adequately explain the observed behavior 3. Regression-like models are fine for a one-period-ahead prediction, but not beyond that horizon 4. If the observed behavior is viewed in an “as if” random manner, it would be wrong to put it into a regression-like model as if it’s deterministically true 5. Regression-like models can’t capture non-stationarity, i.e., changes in behavioral propensities over time
This question was answered on: Sep 21, 2023
Solution~00021147636529.zip (25.37 KB)
This attachment is locked
Our expert Writers have done this assignment before, you can reorder for a fresh, original and plagiarism-free copy and it will be redone much faster (Deadline assured. Flexible pricing. TurnItIn Report provided)
Answered
QUALITYApproved
DATE ANSWEREDSep 21, 2023
EXPERTTutor
ANSWER RATING
We have top-notch tutors who can do your essay/homework for you at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments.
You can also use these solutions:
